HOMEBREW Digest #3816 Tue 18 December 2001


[Prev HBD] [Index] [Next HBD] [Back]


	FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
		Digest Janitor: janitor@hbd.org


***************************************************************
       THIS YEAR'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY: 

          Northern  Brewer, Ltd. Home Brew Supplies
        http://www.northernbrewer.com  1-800-681-2739

    Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********


Contents:
  Subject: Hop gardening help needed ("Larry Cooney")
  Tobacco/smoked beer (GordonRick)
  Real Guinness is not paltry ("Tom & Dee McConnell")
  Electric Squirrel Saga ("Tom & Dee McConnell")
  re: Hop gardening help needed ("Richardson, Martin")
  RE: Yeast Trouble and a new ? ("Brad Boes")
  RE: cold conditioning koelsch ("Houseman, David L")
  Re: Hop gardening help needed (gsferg)
  Re: second running (Joel Plutchak)
  Fw: Yeast Pitching Rates (Alan Meeker)
  Smoke 'em if ya got 'em (Nathan Kanous)
  Squirrels from Hell! ("Charles R. Stewart")
  Samiclaus (LJ Vitt)
  Newbe question about brewing quantity ("Hodges, Walt")
  Re: Bottle Testing with baking soda (Spencer W Thomas)
  re: Hop gardening help needed (Rama Roberts)
  Re: second running (Spencer W Thomas)
  Water Softener ("Hedglin, Nils A")
  Request for recommendations of Brewpubs in the Mesa AZ (Phoenix) area ("Hodges, Walt")

* * Show your HBD pride! Wear an HBD Badge! * http://hbd.org/cgi-bin/shopping * * Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! * Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!! To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!** IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address for the automation - that's your job. The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit. More information is available by sending the word "info" to req at hbd.org. JANITOR on duty: Pat Babcock and Karl Lutzen (janitor@hbd.org)
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 00:16:34 -0500 From: "Larry Cooney" <lyvewire1 at hotmail.com> Subject: Subject: Hop gardening help needed "Paul Kensler" WRITES: I have some really obnoxious squirrels digging up my hop beds...Has anyone experienced the same problem and found a way to beat the little buggers or at least dissuade them from tearing up the hop garden? Well Paul... I think squirrel would go good with a nice cool Homebrew! And if you have a recipie for Tsing Tao from China... well that may solve the cat issue! Larry Cooney Wesley Chapel, Florida Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 00:35:49 EST From: GordonRick at aol.com Subject: Tobacco/smoked beer Ref: Tobacco in beer. Sorry to keep this thread alive, but I couldn't stop myself. If you've ever had the pleasure of drinking an original "Rauchbier" (smoked beer) from The Schlenkerla restaurant/brewery in Bamberg, Germany (a couple of blocks from the old Rathaus in the middle of the river) you will have come as close to cigar-in-your-beer heaven as you would ever hope to. Skip the tobacco in the mash and smoke the grains (or buy smoked barley from Weyermann's). Substitute as much as you dare into your favorite Marzen recipe and go for it. I normally use 2-3 lbs. per 5 gal. but let your palette rule. Yes, I've been in the Copenhagen induced four-point posture myself as a teenager, as have many of you I'm sure. I've never felt so sick in my life (of course we were chugging "little" Miller's at the time....Hmm.) Prost! Rick (somewhere way south of Jeff Renner) Hopfen und Malz, Gott Erhalt's Return to table of contents
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 23:37:07 -0700 From: "Tom & Dee McConnell" <tdmc at bigfoot.com> Subject: Real Guinness is not paltry ref Craig Olson's 14 Dec 2001 post about the alc% of Guinness being a paltry 3.7%. Don't be to quick to hammer Guinness. Memory serves me right, what is served in Ireland is closer to 2.5% (any UKHBD folks out there)- ever wonder how the lads drink all day and survive? At 2.5%, you drown long before getting drunk. I lived in England and have had Guinness in Dublin, Ireland (excellent, smooth, well balanced, give me more); various places in England (quite good, fairly smooth, balanced, I'll have another one the next time at the pub). Then I came back to America for a visit. Went to a pub. The only thing they had decent was Guinness - saved by the bell. So I had one in America - (bad, flavors on edge, roasty toasty in the face, I'll have a Coke instead). Don't know what Yanks do the it, but they sure manage to ruin it (maybe AB has inserted agents at the brewery?). I won't drink Guinness in America any more - it is just not a good drink here - please fill up my Coke glass. In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there is bacteria. - German Proverb Return to table of contents
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 23:37:07 -0700 From: "Tom & Dee McConnell" <tdmc at bigfoot.com> Subject: Electric Squirrel Saga Maybe Paul Kensler could fix his squirrel problems by spraying his hop garden with a tobacco tea? Or maybe puree some habenaro~s and spray that about? Love your idea about electrifying a grid. Be sure you REALLY know what you are doing first. It can be done (witness electric fences), but remember they are 100% non-descriminating. I recall a fellow Boy Scout stopping to pee during a hike. Now boys being boys, just aim it to the side of the trail and take care of business you see. BUT, at the side of this trail was a pulsating electric fence obscured by weeds. Poor lad got zapped and couldn't move. About the time he almost got the faucet shut off, another zap caused key muscles to contract and you guess it - the faucet wouldn't turn off. That day, the whole troop learned the real meaning of having the piss scared out of us. Serious, mate, make sure you REALLY know what you are doing. Then, of course, you could rent Caddyshack and apply the lessons learned from that (and post the pictures, please) In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there is bacteria. - German Proverb Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 21:18:44 +1100 From: "Richardson, Martin" <RicharMP at Pasminco.com.au> Subject: re: Hop gardening help needed Paul says: >>>I've thought about a grid of electrified mesh topped with razor wire and patrolled by Dobermans surrounding each hop hill, but there has to be an easier way...<<< Maybe a few strategically placed mouse/rat traps would work. If you mulch you could even cover the traps with what you mulch with, and give the critters a surprise. Hope this helps. Cheers, Martin Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 06:54:43 -0600 From: "Brad Boes" <gerald.boes at verizon.net> Subject: RE: Yeast Trouble and a new ? Thanks everyone for all the great replies. Just ordered the equipment for doing starters. Now- another quick question: I saw in the back of the issue of BYO currently available at our grocery store that there was once produced a beastie called a siphon weight. It looked interesting. Anyone know if one can be purchased today? And if so, where? Thanks Brad Boes Princeton, Il [297.5, 257.7] Rennerian Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 07:54:22 -0600 From: "Houseman, David L" <David.Houseman at unisys.com> Subject: RE: cold conditioning koelsch Contrary to the advice below, my experience is that when I bottle condition my lagers and Koelsch (or Alt) -- any beer that's been lagering for a while - -- I do warm it up just by removing from my lagering fridge the day or so before, and I pitch a new starter of yeast. Since I lager in corny kegs, and perhaps haven't been vigilant in bleeding off the CO2 produced, warming a day or so brings CO2 out of solution and makes my final carbonation level more predictable. Otherwise I'd use less sugar to prime but probably not calculate the amount correctly. This just seems easier to me. I have not had any problems with this introducing additional chill haze or problems with off-yeast flavors. I do often, but not always, fine my lagers with gelatin at the end of the lagering period; this seems to help with chill haze and probably necessitates adding additional yeast. I ferment my lagers at room temperatures for two weeks or so and usually they do not go back into cold conditioning. Certainly final priming of bottle-conditioned, lagered beers are not done at cold conditioning temperatures. Dave Houseman SE PA - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 08:51:34 -0500 From: Jeff & Ellen <JeffNGladish at ij.net> Subject: cold conditioning koelsch Leo Vitt wrote about lagering and then bottling a koelsch-style ale, "Put the keg into refrigeration and "lager" the beer for 2 months. Then warm the beer up and bottle with corn sugar, producing bottled conditioned Kolsch." I think it would be better not to warm up the beer before bottling. This defeats some of the purposes of lagering by rousing the dormant yeast that you just spent two months putting to sleep. This may bring back the chill haze and the rough yeast flavors that you took so much care to get rid of. There will probably still be enough yeast in suspension to carbonate even if you bottle when cold, but it may take a little longer. Jeff Gladish, Tampa, Fl. (989.5,175.5) Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 09:13:47 -0500 From: gsferg at clary.gwi.net Subject: Re: Hop gardening help needed Paul Kensler complained about squirrels harrassing his hop beds: >I have some really obnoxious squirrels digging up my hop beds - they are >completely exposing the rhizomes. I cover them back up, and they dig them >back up. Also the occasional constitutional visit from the neighbor's cat, >but that is more insult than injury. Has anyone experienced the same >problem and found a way to beat the little buggers or at least dissuade them >from tearing up the hop garden? Interesting. Apparently, since they're not after the hop rhizomes themselves, they must be after something else- life is typically too short and precious for beady-eyed bucktoothed "prey" critters to go about wasting their time maliciously and repeatedly digging up the same dirt for no apparent reason. A cache of nuts perhaps? I've never had trouble with squirrels attacking my hops. A few aphids and some tent catapillars maybe, but not squirrels. Are you sure they are squirrels and not moles? Moles will do a lot of excavation searching for worms to eat. Do they attack anything else in the general area? Find what they're after and get rid of it and you should solve your problem. That said... >I've thought about a grid of electrified mesh topped with razor wire and >patrolled by Dobermans surrounding each hop hill, but there has to be an >easier way... Land mines! Small explosive anti-rodent devices would be fun to build, spectacularly effective, if not particularly sporting. Might be a little hard on your neighbor's cats however. If you are in a rural setting you could try staking out the plot and blowing the little critters away with a shotgun or .22 calibre pistol. If you're in an urban setting where the use of firearms is discouraged, you might need to use something quieter- like a blow gun or CO2 pistol. This would be effective and sporting, and you could eat the little suckers! Squirrels are best stewed since they can be kinda tough. If you are vegetarian, a pacifist, or just find yourself playing the role of Wiley E. Coyote vs the Road Runner and failing miserably, less violent measures might be in order. If you can't convince them to go away, fence them out; get yourself some chicken wire and construct cages around your plants, burying the bottom edge deep enough to keep them from going under the wire. Make the cages several feet in diameter and several feet high- I've used this approach effectively in my garden against deer, rabbits, and wood chucks. George- - -- George S. Fergusson <gsferg at clary.gwi.net> Oracle DBA, Programmer, Humorist, and Pest Control Specialist Wooden Bear Brewery Whitefield, Maine US [729.7, 79.6] Renerian - -------------- I am a man, I can change, if I have to, I guess. Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 08:19:42 -0600 (CST) From: Joel Plutchak <plutchak at uiuc.edu> Subject: Re: second running In HBD #3814 "steve lane" <tbirdusa at hotmail.com> writes: >Is there a tool (software) out there to help me figure out what the >gravity on my second batch will be... theorectically? What have other >done on second running batches off of a BIG first running? I've been doing quite a few first- and second-runnings batches the past couple years. I either do a standard fly sparge or a something halfway between batch and fly sparging. I don't sweat gravity too much, but figure I'll get a total 72% extraction, with 50% for the first beer and 22% for the second. I plan my grain bill from there. Works fairly well. Joel Plutchak <plutchak at [...]> Boneyard Union of Zymurgical Zealots Champaign Illinois USA Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 09:16:04 -0500 From: Alan Meeker <ameeker at mail.jhmi.edu> Subject: Fw: Yeast Pitching Rates There have been several recent posts requesting info on yeast pitching. Since traffic seems relatively slow lately, I'm re-posting this info on yeast pitching rates: - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Most published sources give optimal or commercial pitching rates which aim at achieving from 5 million to 20 million /viable/ yeast cells per ml of wort. Another commonly cited rule of thumb, which takes into account differences in starting gravities, is to pitch one million yeast, per ml of wort, per degree Plato (~.004 SG units). Both of these approaches give rates within the 5-20 million yeast per ml range for "normal" gravity worts. [Note that these are pitch rates for ALE yeasts. The recommended rates for LAGER yeast range anywhere from 2X to 5X higher.] So, for ale yeasts, the bottom line is that one needs to pitch a total of about 200 billion yeast cells into a typical 5 gallon batch to achieve the "commercial" pitch rate. How does one achieve this in the homebrew setting? Well, it will depend, to a large extent, on what type of yeast you are planning on using for your pitch: DRY YEAST - Supposedly, dry yeast packets contain some 5-40 billion yeast cells per gram weight (published values vary from source to source. Note that these are counts of VIABLE yeast, so I imagine much of this variabiltiy in published counts is due to differences in the care with which the yeast was handled and stored which will, in turn, impact the measured viability of the yeast) At any rate, it seems that a value of 10 billion cells per gram dried yeast is a reasonably conservative estimate to work with. This leads to the conclusion that one should pitch about 20 GRAMS OF DRIED YEAST PER 5 GALLON BATCH. This means using two, 10 gram packages to reach the "commercial" pitch rate. Alternatively, you could start with less if you plan on "stepping-up" the dried yeast following reactivation prior to pitching. Also, according to Ray Daniels, good results can be had by using up to 10-fold less yeast - what he refers to as the "homebrew pitch rate," although Daniels is quick to point out that, in his opinion, this should be viewed as a bare minimum pitch rate. LIQUID YEAST "SMACK PACKS" - These contain about 40-50 ml volume and supposedly generate some 2.5 billion yeast when properly swelled (published ranges vary between 1 billion and 5 billion cells, so 2.5 billion seems reasonable). So, if you were to use a single, standard sized pack to start your 5 gallon batch of beer you'd be UNDERPITCHING BY 100-FOLD! (compared to commercial pitch rates) This means you would either need to buy 100 smack packs (ouch!) or "step-up" the starter by innoculating the smack pack into a larger volume of sterile wort in order to grow more yeast. Increasing the yeast numbers by 100X may sound a bit daunting, but don't worry, you can let the magic of "exponential growth" do the work for you. Since the yeast grow by simple cell division, the population essentially doubles with each yeast generation (generation times can be as fast as two hours when the yeast are really happy and cranking right along). If we are starting with a swolen smack pack we have about 2.5 billion cells. Now, if we transfer these yeast to fresh sterile wort, in just one generation we'll have 5 billion, then 10 billion, then 20 billion and so on... resulting in our desired goal of 200 billion cells in only 6 to 7 yeast generations. For actively growing yeast, this entire process will take less than 24 hours to complete. The only problem we run into is that there is a limit to how dense a satrter culture can be grown because of problems due to overcrowding - they will eat up all the nutrients (actually there will usualy be only one so-called "limiting" nutrient which will run out first, typically nitrogen if the wort is well aerated) and be swimming in a sea of waste products (aka- beer!). The take home message is that it requires several LITERS (or about 1 gallon) of stepped-up starter to reach the commercial pitch rate. Most people can probably handle making a gallon starter, but usually you want to let the yeast settle prior to pitching (refrigeration will help promote this) so that you can pour off the used wort which, if you're allowing air in like you should, would negatively affect the flavor of the finished beer. Remember also that you don't have to step up to the whole gallon volume all at one time, you could do it in stages such as 4 X 1/4 gallon steps, as long as you make sure you are getting most of the yeast through to the next step... USED YEAST SLURRY - Published suggested pitching rates rates call for 3 oz (weight) of thick slurry per 5 gallon batch, or about 4-8 oz liquid volume (approx. 60% solids). Caveats here include: (1) There can be a lot of variability in the amount of non-yeast solids present in yeast slurries. (2) There can be significant variation in the number of viable cells (due to strain differences, differnces in fermentation or storage conditions; for example higher gravity ferments or high temperatures, etc.) (3) Viability can decrease markedly with time post-fermentation. This is especially true at higher storage temperatures. (4) These yeast have just finished ANAEROBIC fermentation and, depending upon their state at original pitch, the original pitch size, and wort composition, may be criticaly depleted of sterols and unsaturated fatty acids. Thus, wort OXYGENATION will be VERY IMPORTANT if this yeast is going to be re-pitched, much more so than for a well oxygenated/aerated starter from a stepped-up smack pack. They may also have severley depleted their reserve carbohydrates (glycogen and trehalose). There are MANY potential ills attributable to underpitching. I know my beers improved DRAMATICALLY once I started pitching decent amounts of yeast. Good luck, and hope this helps! -Alan Meeker Baltimore, MD Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 08:55:43 -0600 From: Nathan Kanous <nlkanous at pharmacy.wisc.edu> Subject: Smoke 'em if ya got 'em Hello Everyone, Tobacco Stout? Not here. Thanks for the offer. However, I'm from Wisconsin. There are three constants in Wisconsin. At least 3 culinary constants in Wisconsin. Beer, cheese, and sausage. Guess what? Many sausages are smoked. Smoked sausage, smoked cheese, smoked.....yup, you guessed it, smoked beer. As I understand it, in Germany malt is smoked by the same folks that smoke meats and sausages. So, here I sit in Madison, my happy little homestead literally within 1 mile of a sausage company (thankfully it's south so I don't smell it all the time). So my brain starts working overtime. Actually at a recent Madison Homebrewers meeting I got talking with another brewer about smoked beer and I kinda got the bug. I thought "hey, call the folks at the sausage company and ask them to smoke some malt to make a beer." What a great idea!!! I need more reasons to make beer. So here are a few thoughts and questions that I have. I've heard that malt should be smoked "wet". How much water should be added to the malt before smoking? How long should I have the malt smoked? How long should I allow the malt to rest before brewing? Next, recipes? As I read it, Schlenkerla Rauchbier is in the Marzen style. How much of the recipe should be smoked? All munich malt recipe? Half munich, half pilsner? Some crystal? Buy up the last reserves of DWC aromatic and make a 100% aromatic malt rauchbier? Wouldn't that be an interesting treat? C'mon folks let's talk brewing. The digest has been a bit slow. Give me some input here. Hell, this could make for an interesting Zymurgy article, eh Ray? nathan in madison, wi Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 11:21:03 -0500 From: "Charles R. Stewart" <Charles at TheStewarts.com> Subject: Squirrels from Hell! Paul - I well know the havoc the Gaithersburg squirrels can wreck on gardens. Last year the little bastards ate several hundred tulip bulbs out of my yard, digging up my flower beds and leaving only one solitary tulip this past spring. Over the past few weeks, they've eaten over 50 pounds of bird food from my bird feeder. So I've declared war on them. At first I was going to get an air rifle and thin the population a bit. Unfortunately, that plan was vetoed by SWMBO. So I invested in a wrist-rocket type slingshot and package of 40 cal. paintballs. Didn't work as well as I had hoped - they still come around. But it feels really good to nail 'em. And they're really skittish now. Oh, and I can tell the repeat offenders by the bright markings! On a more practical note you can try to use either a repelant or barrier. I believe Potomac Garden Center on Darnstown Road (301-948-8890)(NAJASCYYY) carries several products that may help. I've seen several local garden centers that carry predator urine you spray near the scene of the crime. You can chose mountain lion, fox, etc. (wouldn't want to cross the guy who collects THAT product!). Also, squirrels are reported to be repelled by blood meal and I know Potomac Garden carries it. Also, I've been told that squirrels are sensative to capsaicin. Maybe a big 'ol tub of cayenne pepper from Costco sprinkled about would help. Or a little Dave's Insanity Sauce sprinkled on the soil (I have some if you need it). Finally, the most effective method in my experience is a barrier. You could use 1/2" hardware cloth burried an inch or so above the rhizomes (or maybe a fine chicken wire). I know some landscapers use that to keep rats from munching on bulbs in urban areas. Good luck! Of course, if you want to borrow my sling shot . . . . >On Sat, 15 Dec 2001, Paul Kensler <pkensler at home.com> inquired about squirrels and hop gardening > I have some really obnoxious squirrels digging up my hop beds - they are > completely exposing the rhizomes. I cover them back up, and they dig them > back up. Also the occasional constitutional visit from the neighbor's cat, > but that is more insult than injury. Has anyone experienced the same > problem and found a way to beat the little buggers or at least dissuade them > from tearing up the hop garden? > I've thought about a grid of electrified mesh topped with razor wire and > patrolled by Dobermans surrounding each hop hill, but there has to be an > easier way... Chip Stewart Also Gaithersburg, MD Charles at TheStewarts.com http://Charles.TheStewarts.com Pursuant to United States Code, Title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II, Section 227, any and all unsolicited commercial e-mail (spam) sent to this address is subject to a download and archival fee of US$500.00. The sending or forwarding of such e-mail constitutes acceptance of these terms. Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 08:28:30 -0800 (PST) From: LJ Vitt <lvitt4 at yahoo.com> Subject: Samiclaus - ------------------------------ Rod Prather asked about 2000 Samiclaus >Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 10:45:31 -0500 >From: Rod Prather <rodpr at iquest.net> >Subject: Samiclaus >Word was that Samiclaus was produced in 2000 for the 2001 season. I haven't >been reading the HBD lately. Has anyone tried the new batch? Is it >available? Does anyplace have it in Indiana? Indianapolis? It is available. I tried it with a small group on Friday and we compared it to the 1996. It is great... I think improved. I think it should also improve with aging. The 2000 is made by the castle brewery Eggenberg - Austria. That is the maker of EKU 28. The old stuff was made in Switzerland. My friend found it in Minneapolis. No idea if Rod can find in Indiana. - Leo Vitt Rochester, MN Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 11:53:05 -0600 From: "Hodges, Walt" <whodges at teamists.com> Subject: Newbe question about brewing quantity Am preparing to make my first brew. Have read many tips and tricks, and thoroughly understand the need for cleanliness and sanitation. Am following various threads of the digest but can't find an answer to my question. Because I only have access to 5 gallon plastic carboy (repurposed "Crystal Clear" plastic 5 gallon jug) I believe that my wort quantity has to be less than 5 gallons. Correct? How do I convert a recipe stated for 5 gallons into a 4 gallon recipe? The 4 gallon quantity is my attempt to leave a "good head room" in the fermenter. How much headroom is "good"? Your response is greatly appreciated Thanks, Brewing from Ankeny IA (502.8, 268.8) Walt Hodges Network Engineer ISTS Work: (515) 334-4327 Cell: (515) 577-2366 "Fools you are... who say you like to learn from your mistakes.... I prefer to learn from the mistakes of others and avoid the cost of my own." Otto von Bismarck - Architect of the German Empire. Credited with the 1871 unification of Germany. Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 15:27:45 -0500 From: Spencer W Thomas <spencer at engin.umich.edu> Subject: Re: Bottle Testing with baking soda Hmm. Let's assume that 1/4tsp of NaHCO3 = 1.25 grams, based on the probably faulty assumption that 1tsp masses 5 g. The mole weight of NaHCO3 is 23 + 1 + 12 + 3*16 = 84 Each molecule of NaHCO3 produces one molecule of CO2, with a mole weight of 44. So 44/84 of the baking soda is released as CO2. This is .65 grams. 1 gram of CO2 is about 1/2 liter. So you'll get about about 1/3 liter of CO2 from your reaction. Not really enough to get worried about, is it? =Spencer in Ann Arbor, pretty darn close to [0,0] Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 12:50:29 -0800 (PST) From: Rama Roberts <rama at retro.eng.sun.com> Subject: re: Hop gardening help needed > I have some really obnoxious squirrels digging up my hop beds - they are > completely exposing the rhizomes. I cover them back up, and they dig them > back up. I haven't tried growing hops (yet), but here in the San Francisco bay area, I've had the same problem with squirrels digging up freshly planted items. My theory is they're attracted to the smell of fresh potting soil more than the plants, since the plants remain unharmed, just dug up. I cover the fresh soil with "native" soil to mask it a bit, with mixed results. Once plants are there for a month or so, the squirrels lose interest. Maybe try tacking down some landscaping fabric, or a mesh, over the rhizomes? - --rama Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 15:54:16 -0500 From: Spencer W Thomas <spencer at engin.umich.edu> Subject: Re: second running Well, your theoretical maximum extraction (34 pt-gal/lb) from 22lbs of grain is about 748 "point-gallons" of gravity. Your second runnings of 10 gallons at 1.038 would take 380 "point-gallons" of sugar, leaving 368 "point-gallons" for your imperial stout. In 5 gallons, this gives you an OG of 1.073. In practice, of course, you won't get the theoretical maximum, and your second beer will be pretty weak. You don't say how big you want your Imperial stout to be. If you're aiming for 1.090, say, then you might want to collect 6 gallons of 1st runnings at 1.075. In my system, you'd get this OG from the first runnings if you use about 1.6 quarts of water per pound of grain, and you'll get about 1.1 quarts of wort per pound of grain upon fully draining the mash. This works out to just over 6 gallons of wort! In the process you would have removed 75pt * 6gal = 450 pt-gal of sugar from the mash. If your normal sparge extraction is 30 pt-gal/lb, you've got (22 * 30 - 450) = 210 pt-gal left. To get a gravity of 1.038, you'd want to end up with 210/38 = 5.5 gallons of wort after the boil. So, I think you'd do better to aim for 5 gallons of imp stout and 5 gallons of "plain" stout. Mix your mash with 1.5 quarts of water per pound of grain (33 quarts or 8.25 gallons) and drain the mash dry. Then add more water and sparge as normal to 6 - 6.5 gallons for your second beer. =Spencer Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:26:38 -0800 From: "Hedglin, Nils A" <nils.a.hedglin at intel.com> Subject: Water Softener Hi, I finally realized my whole-house water softener that so wonderfully removes cholrine by my brewing liquor uses salt in the process, so it has a high level of sodium. I'm sure this is affecting my beer in some way, but not quite sure how. Any one have an idea? Is there something I could do to get around it other than buying bottled/distilled water? Thanks, Nils Hedglin Sacramento, CA Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 15:13:55 -0600 From: "Hodges, Walt" <whodges at teamists.com> Subject: Request for recommendations of Brewpubs in the Mesa AZ (Phoenix) area Emergency trip to Mesa has just appeared on my calendar. Any decent (or Great) brewpubs in the Mesa area? If not Mesa, how about the Phoenix area? Thanks, Reading and brewing from Ankeny IA (502.8, 268.8) Walt Hodges Network Engineer ISTS Work: (515) 334-4327 Cell: (515) 577-2366 "Fools you are... who say you like to learn from your mistakes.... I prefer to learn from the mistakes of others and avoid the cost of my own." Otto von Bismarck - Architect of the German Empire. Credited with the 1871 unification of Germany. Return to table of contents
[Prev HBD] [Index] [Next HBD] [Back]
HTML-ized on 12/18/01, by HBD2HTML v1.2 by KFL
webmaster at hbd.org, KFL, 10/9/96
/n